How radioactive dating works Live free 2 way chat de sexo da colombia online
Later, this date was confirmed by two other dating methods (paleomagnetism and fission tracks), and was widely accepted.Then Richard Leakey found a skull (called KNM-ER 1470) the KBS tuff, a skull that looked far too modern to be 3 million years old.With reference to the theory of evolution, "if in doubt, throw it out". ago...) (if that's the Worst example a creation-site can find to discredit these kind of measurements...In many universities you are taught "what to think" and not "how to think". then I must say these methods are pretty much awesome ; D !!!!Tests by other scientists using paleomagnetism and fission tracks confirmed the lower date.So by 1980 there was a new, remarkably concordant date for the KBS tuff, and this became the one that was widely accepted.
This new date agreed with the appearance of the new skull.
For example, if you do not accept dendrochronology as an accurate method or radio carbon dating which method do you accept and and on what grounds.
Also, can you identify a non Christian scientist who has provided scientific evidence for a young earth. Dear Bob, The only reliable way of knowing the age of anything is by the historical method, by eyewitnesses.
It amazes me that I still hear all the regular mantras I heard in college as an unbeliever, "all real scientists believe in [macro] evolution." Groupthink is alive and well. ) Hi David, It seems that you have missed the point.
This water dropping into a cylinder - explanation to refute dating was quite "simple" indeed. beforehand there were others who found 2.61 and 3 mill..... at least one would then assume with some confidence it should have occured between 1 and 4 million years ago... All dating methods are based on assumptions about age, not measurements of age.